Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Updating minted.el

[Tassilo Horn]

Arash Esbati <address@hidden> writes:

Hi Arash,

>> Hm, the anomaly sounds strange.  Anyhow, your patch looks very good,
>> so feel free to commit it as is.  I'll try to reproduce that issue
>> then an see if there can be something done.
>
> Thanks.  My original approach is attached as myminted.el.  The only
> difference is the re-arrangement at the beginning of the file and the
> ,(list "style" (LaTeX-minted-style-list)) line in
> `LaTeX-minted-key-val-options'.

Just a nitpick, I think

  ("style" ,(LaTeX-minted-style-list))

is slightly more readable (and completely equivalent).

> Here a small .tex file for testing.  When I restart Emacs and open
> this file, Emacs asks if I want to apply TeX-command-extra-options:
> "-shell-escape" and then does not kill the frame.  This happens only
> on the first run, after that, it works as expected.

I can't reproduce that with neither the current Emacs master branch nor
Emacs 25.1 (starting them with -Q) and the current AUCTeX master.  For
me, the window where Emacs asks if the file-local variable should be
applied is buried after I give my response.

But you say the "frame" is not killed.  Do we talk about the same thing?
A frame in Emacs is what everyone else calls a window (i.e., an X11
window with a title bar), and a window in Emacs is what most people
would call a pane.

Bye,
Tassilo