[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[AUCTeX] Again, some inconsistency about math-mode
From: |
Heiko Schroeder |
Subject: |
[AUCTeX] Again, some inconsistency about math-mode |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Oct 2008 22:38:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Dear folks,
I wonder if I have missed a mail explaining how to get all the default
math-macros by C-cRET run. It seems as if AUCTeX does not know about these
macros, even if you load LaTeX-math-mode by default (with add-hook etc.).
Of course, all of the macros are in the menu (but who wants to use a mouse),
some of them have shortcuts and -- if you like pain, you can configure
LaTeX-math-list with custom. But I would like to see the macros working with
Completion.
Thanks a lot, if you have a hint or if you remember the time-region where such
a mail already answered my question.
I was very astonished to see that the manual speaks about *supporting the
tradition*. Math is not a *LaTeX-tradition* IMHO, it is one of the most
important aspects of LaTeX, but the really splendid AUCTeX is definetly
lacking a bit of comfort in this specific case IMHO. What a vast amount of
mails in this forum about this topic.
(Really: it may be sureley *much* more important to present an example for an
entry of math-list than explanining that the option 'label' of floats
means 'the label of a float environment' and the 'caption' is indeed
the 'caption of the float'. Nobody is a potatoe (quote from another very good
manual)). Nevertheless, the manual is one of the best ever written -- except
but the much too short mathematical part. Perhaps Math is for AUCTeX of
similar importance as regular expressions are for Emacs?
Cheers
Heiko
--
Heiko Schroeder
Praha, Ceska Republica
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [AUCTeX] Again, some inconsistency about math-mode,
Heiko Schroeder <=