auctex
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AUCTeX] auctex cannot find kpsewhich


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] auctex cannot find kpsewhich
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 10:07:58 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux)

Laurent Hoeltgen <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi all,
>
> I have a small (probably trivial) question. I'm running lubuntu 11.10
> with emacs 23.3.1. and auctex installed from the ubuntu repos.
> However, I installed TeX by hand (e.g. from
> http://www.tug.org/texlive/ and not from the ubuntu repos). Now when I
> want to enter the macro "\usepackage" through "C-c Return" I get the
> following message:
>
> Searching for program: no such file or directory, kpsewhich
>
> I assume that auctex is looking at the wrong place for kpsewhich.
> kpsewhich is installed here:
> /usr/local/texlive/2011/bin/i386-linux/kpsewhich and
> /usr/local/texlive/2011/bin/i386-linux is in my PATH variable. (It's
> being added to the PATH in my .bashrc file in my home folder.
>
> Any ideas on how I can fix this?

Check the settings in
(getenv "PATH")
and
exec-path

Personally, I use

(defun TeXlive (year)
  "Use TeXlive with the given year (given as string), nil if no TeXlive."
  (interactive
   (let* ((year
           (directory-files "/usr/local/texlive/" nil "\\`[0-9]+\\'")))
     (setq year
           (completing-read (format "Year to use (default %s): "
                                    (car (last year)))
                            (cons "none" year)
                            nil t nil nil (car (last year))))
     (list (unless (string= year "none") year))))
  (let ((path (getenv "PATH")))
    (while (string-match "/usr/local/texlive/[0-9]+/bin/i386-linux:" path)
      (setq path (replace-match "" t t path)))
    (when year
      (setq path (format "/usr/local/texlive/%s/bin/i386-linux:%s"
                         year path)))
    (setenv "PATH" path)))

to select one of several TeXlive installations.  Apparently, exec-path
does not need setting here: at least I don't have problems without it.

-- 
David Kastrup



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]