Re: [AUCTeX] auctex Digest, Vol 129, Issue 18: Setup for new PDF-Tools

[Tassilo Horn]

Hi,

I think it's easy enough to check TeX-engine in the hook function so that 
one hook is enough. But then a more generic name would be better. How about 
TeX-after-compilation-finished-hook?

Bye,
Tassilo


On November 22, 2015 23:04:23 Mosè Giordano <address@hidden> wrote:

> Ciao Andrea,
>
> 2015-11-22 22:24 GMT+01:00 Andrea De Michele <address@hidden>:
> > I also use pdf-tools as pdf viewer with auctex, and the auto refresh of
> > the viewer buffer works (with auctex 11.89) but only with LaTeX, not
> > with ConTeXt.
> >
> > I checked that TeX-after-TeX-LaTeX-command-finished-hook is not used
> > with ConTeXt-mode.
> >
> > I have changed the function TeX-ConTeXt-sentinel in context.el adding at
> > the end
> >
> > (unless TeX-error-list
> >     (run-hook-with-args 'TeX-after-TeX-LaTeX-command-finished-hook
> >                         (with-current-buffer TeX-command-buffer
> >                           (expand-file-name
> >                            (TeX-active-master (TeX-output-extension))))))
> >
> > and now the auto refresh works also in ConTeXt.
> >
> > There is a better way to enable the auto refresh for ConTeXt?
> >
> > It is possible to include in AUCTeX the auto refresh feature also for
> > ConTeXt?
>
> Makes sense to me, but I'm not sure about the name of the hook,
> whether we should have a different hook for each sentinel (it may
> cause code duplication on users' side but they have more control on
> what to run after running a certain command) or a single hook for
> every sentinel, but in this case we should change the name making it
> more general.  I'm inclined toward the first option.  Tassilo, what do
> you think?
>
> Bye,
> Mosè