[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question

From: François Patte
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question
Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 14:51:52 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0

Le 17/04/2017 à 09:30, Tassilo Horn a écrit :
> François Patte <address@hidden> writes:
> Bonjour François,
>> I added to my .Xresources file:
>> "Emacs.font-latex-sedate-face.attributeForeground: indianred2" in
>> order to have all LaTeX commands in indianred.
>> But when I use a command like \- for discretionnary hyphen, the whole
>> word after the \- command is turned into indian red, ie. the
>> fontification is not applied only to the command (which is actually in
>> red).
>> For instance: anti\-constitutionnel: \- is in red and constitutionnel
>> in indian red.
>> Is there a way to avoid this?
> That's a bug.  I just taught font-latex that \-something is not a
> command and should not be highlighted as such.
> I also made a new ELPA release but sadly just *before* I read your mail
> and fixed the bug, so it might take a while until the fix becomes
> available (through ELPA at least).

Thank you for the corrections in the last Auctex version, but openning
an old file, when I typed diacritical mark using TeX command for
accented characters, I can see that the problem remains for all these
commands; examples:

 m\^eme, \'etant, r\'eit\'er\'ee, S\=uryad\=asa and a lot of others...

So, nowadays, using xelatex and unicode we can avoid this... But for
people using a basic 7bits keyboard it could be nice to correct also
these commands...


François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145
Université Paris Descartes
45, rue des Saints Pères
F-75270 Paris Cedex 06
Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]