|
From: | Hans Aberg |
Subject: | Re: experimental features in Bison 2.3a+ |
Date: | Sat, 2 Dec 2006 21:45:23 +0100 |
On 2 Dec 2006, at 21:40, Joel E. Denny wrote:
Is this right? In 2.3a, there is %require that ensures Bison version, butno %requires inserting code. ANd %define can be used to insert code.Right.Right what?Everything you and I said is right.
Your entering the realms of linguistic cryptology causes problems for, as I wanted to give a principle as to why macro for code placement and other macro should not be mixed. Akim was earlier opposed to a %code for code placement, instead putting it into % define. From what you say, %code has another meaning, and %requires is used to place code, and I cannot immediately check what they actually do. Deadlock.
Hans Aberg
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |