[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFA] Java skeleton
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: [RFA] Java skeleton |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:37:18 -0500 (EST) |
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> yyrecovering is fixed in the patch I had attached.
Whoops. Sorry.
> Shortly speaking, yes, I don't think there will be new members. We have the
> precedent that Bison's interface did not change in many many years, and if it
> did, it was always only when a particular %-directive was specified.
But we also have the precedent that Bison pretty much prefixes every
symbol, right? Seems safer. I'm not sure I see much harm.
> As to the other point, I haven't thought much about it yet.
In case it's not clear, my proposal a few messages back should resolve
that issue.
- Re: ** SPAM? (5.865) ** Re: [RFA] Java skeleton, Joel E. Denny, 2007/02/24
- Re: ** SPAM? (5.865) ** Re: [RFA] Java skeleton, Paolo Bonzini, 2007/02/26
- Message not available
- Re: [RFA] Java skeleton, Joel E. Denny, 2007/02/26
- Re: [RFA] Java skeleton, Paolo Bonzini, 2007/02/27
- Re: [RFA] Java skeleton,
Joel E. Denny <=
- Re: [RFA] Java skeleton, Paolo Bonzini, 2007/02/27
- Re: [RFA] Java skeleton, Joel E. Denny, 2007/02/27
- Re: [RFA] Java skeleton, Paolo Bonzini, 2007/02/27
- Re: [RFA] Java skeleton, Joel E. Denny, 2007/02/27
- Re: [RFA] Java skeleton, Paolo Bonzini, 2007/02/27
- Re: [RFA] Java skeleton, Joel E. Denny, 2007/02/27