Re: [PATCH] Re: named references

[Joel E. Denny]

On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Akim Demaille wrote:

> Thanks a lot for all this work.  I know several people who are eager
> to use Bison with your contribution!

I know I'm eager.

> I'm not sure asymmetric will be understandable in error messages.
> Maybe "partial" would be more appropriate?

I agree "asymmetric" is a confusing name.  "partial" may be better.  A few 
other ideas off the top of my head: "incomplete", "nonuniform", 
"inconsistent".

>  > You may consider it "disabled" in the following examples. Actually,
>  > I am not sure that it would be helpful.
> 
> I subscribe to Joel's ideas about this, I would really prefer that we
> have this warning.  Actually, we didn't we make this an error?

I can't remember, but an error seems good to me.