[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't |
Date: |
13 Oct 2002 09:28:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter) |
| > From: "Jim Gifford" <address@hidden>
| > Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 12:09:02 -0700
| >
| > vcc.y:209.9-211.9: type clash (`' `vobj') on default action
| > vcc.y:260.6-264.12: type clash (`' `str') on default action
| > vcc.y:292.7-51: type clash (`' `str') on default action
|
| Thanks for the bug report. I installed the following patch to fix it.
|
| 2002-10-12 Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
|
| * src/reader.c (grammar_current_rule_check):
| Don't worry about the default action if $$ is untyped.
| Prevents bogus warnings reported by Jim Gifford in
| <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-bison/2002-October/001673.html>.
Hm... Are you sure we want this? What does POSIX say? I *fixed* a
bug here, before Bison was not complaining for such cases when there
was a midrule action, that's the only difference with 1.35.
I tend to think that type checking is soo weak with Yaccs, that being
a little paranoid can only help here.
- Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't, Jim Gifford, 2002/10/12
- Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't, Paul Eggert, 2002/10/12
- Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't,
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't, Paul Eggert, 2002/10/13
- Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't, Akim Demaille, 2002/10/13
- Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't, Paul Eggert, 2002/10/14
- Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't, Tim Van Holder, 2002/10/14
- Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't, Paul Eggert, 2002/10/14
- Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't, Tim Van Holder, 2002/10/14
- Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't, Akim Demaille, 2002/10/14
- Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't, Akim Demaille, 2002/10/14
- Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't, Akim Demaille, 2002/10/14
- Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't, Paul Eggert, 2002/10/14