[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gcc-3_2-branch bootstrap failure when using bison-1.50
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: gcc-3_2-branch bootstrap failure when using bison-1.50 |
Date: |
14 Oct 2002 11:08:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter) |
| Attached are backports of patches I found on the mailing
| lists (c, cp and java). Checked today's CVS with 1.35, CVS with the
| patch attached with 1.35 and with 1.50. cp and java don't show
| regressions. for c:
|
| - CVS and CVS+patch, both bison-1.35: no regressions.
| - bison-1.35 and bison-1.50, both CVS+patch:
|
| --- test-summary-1.35 2002-10-14 00:16:08.000000000 +0200
| +++ test-summary-1.50 2002-10-13 13:55:39.000000000 +0200
| @@ -39,11 +39,43 @@
| FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20020927-1.c, -O3 -g
| FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2e.c execution, -Os
| FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-3c.c execution, -Os
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 69)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 72)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 74)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 77)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 69)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 72)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 74)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 77)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 69)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 72)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 74)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 77)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 69)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 72)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 74)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 77)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 69)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 72)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 74)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 77)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 69)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 72)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 74)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 77)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 69)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 72)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 74)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 77)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 69)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 72)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 74)
| +FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 77)
|
| === gcc Summary ===
|
| -# of expected passes 18721
| -# of unexpected failures 6
| +# of expected passes 18689
| +# of unexpected failures 38
| # of expected failures 66
| # of unsupported tests 43
Could someone given some details on these errors? I have frequently
used pre-1.50 to bootstrap GCC, with success. Unfortunately, due to
some stupid policy here, I have stopped downloading GCC and checking
it with the current Bisons. Nevertheless, I can't imagine what
incompatibility can have been introduced in the meanwhile.
Also, I'm not sure how
| - CVS and CVS+patch, both bison-1.35: no regressions.
| - bison-1.35 and bison-1.50, both CVS+patch:
should be read: it seems to say that there are no regressions with the
patch and 1.35 (line 1), and there are regressions with the patch and
1.35 (line 2).