[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Submission for manual (was: Non-greedy wildcard possible?)
From: |
Frank Heckenbach |
Subject: |
Re: Submission for manual (was: Non-greedy wildcard possible?) |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jun 2004 01:01:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
semail 20040101 |
This is a proposed section for the manual about using GLR in a
"simple" way, without things like `%dprec' and `%merge', just to
overcome the look-ahead limit for grammars that are unambiguous CFG,
but not LALR(1).
Hans Aberg wrote:
> [Follow-ups to Bug-Bison.]
> At 06:33 +0200 2004/06/10, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
> >OK, I've written something (attached), to be inserted after the
> >existing `GLR Parsers' section. Should I just post it to bug-bison,
> >or what to do with it?
>
> I think you should contact Paul Eggert or Akim Demaille for further
> instructions.
>
> You need to sign a paper that your contributions are
> donations to GNU.
Yes, I did this. (I made some contributions last year already.)
> >While conceptually it may be preferable to put this simpler example
> >*before* the existing C++ example, I didn't do this because some
> >general words about GLR then would have to be moved from there to
> >the new section, and some rearrangements elsewhere might be
> >necessary. Someone else might want to do this if deemed useful ...
>
> Also, Paul Hilfinger werote the GLR parser, so you should perhaps get
> inputs from him as well.
I see you put him on the CC already.
So, is there anything else I should do?
Frank
--
Frank Heckenbach, address@hidden
http://fjf.gnu.de/
GnuPG and PGP keys: http://fjf.gnu.de/plan (7977168E)
glr-simple.texi
Description: TeXInfo document