Re: %destructor feedback

[Akim Demaille]

>>> "Joel" == Joel E Denny <address@hidden> writes:

 > The following seems misleading to me because it seems to imply that
 > the 0 actually has some significance even though the parser
 > discards $$.  You did something similar in your test case patch:

 >   {
 >     $$ = 0;
 >     YYABORT;
 >   }

 > This seems clearer:

 >   {
 >     YYABORT;
 >     $$ = 0;
 >   }

 > similar to:

 >   int function() {
 >     abort();
 >     return 0;
 >   }

 > This seems even clearer:

 >   {
 >     YYABORT;
 >     YYUSE_VAL ($$);
 >   }

 > What do you think?

I'm fine with that change.  Please, go ahead :)