[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: %destructor feedback
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: %destructor feedback |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Jan 2006 11:52:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "Joel" == Joel E Denny <address@hidden> writes:
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Akim Demaille wrote:
>> Le 4 janv. 06 à 20:29, Joel E. Denny a écrit :
>>
>> > I don't see $<foo>3 as simply a waste of characters. I see it as
>> > misleading. It begs the question, "What does `foo' mean?".
>>
>> Well, I wrote foo, but I should have written the actual member name:
>> $<val>3. That's what is needed anyway in the action itself when
>> assigning to $$ (well, $<val>$).
> OK, but that's not enforced.
It never is. Bison is not aware of the names of the %union member
(and IMHO, it doesn't have to).
>> I'm not convinced we need that much. I can leave with $<val>3 :)
Live, obviously. Sorry.
- Re: %destructor feedback, (continued)
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2006/01/03
- Re: %destructor feedback, Akim Demaille, 2006/01/03
- Re: %destructor feedback, Akim Demaille, 2006/01/04
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2006/01/04
- Re: %destructor feedback, Frank Heckenbach, 2006/01/04
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2006/01/04
- Re: %destructor feedback, Akim Demaille, 2006/01/04
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2006/01/04
- Re: %destructor feedback,
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2006/01/05
- Re: %destructor feedback, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/04
- Re: %destructor feedback, Akim Demaille, 2006/01/05