[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bison 3.0.3 (stable)
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: Bison 3.0.3 (stable) |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:05:01 +0100 |
> Le 19 janv. 2015 à 11:44, Akim Demaille <address@hidden> a écrit :
>
>> I've run the program named "list" in 426 from gdb with the attached script.
>> Please see the attached output for backtraces at (hopefully) the relevant
>> places. Please don't hesitate if something else from the debugger would be
>> useful.
>
> Thanks for the traces! I don't have time to try to understand them
> now, I'll try to address that in the near future.
Now I know what would be most interesting: debug traces!
Could you please run the same test with YYDEBUG=1 set in the environment?
YYDEBUG=1 make check TESTSUITEFLAGS='-d -v -x 426'
The test will sure fail even more, but we should also get a better
chance to compare my traces with yours. And spot when the spurious
constructor was called.
- Re: Bison 3.0.3 (stable), (continued)
- Re: Bison 3.0.3 (stable), Akim Demaille, 2015/01/19
- Re: Bison 3.0.3 (stable), Thomas Jahns, 2015/01/20
- Re: Bison 3.0.3 (stable), Akim Demaille, 2015/01/20
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Bison 3.0.3 (stable), Thomas Jahns, 2015/01/21
- Re: Bison 3.0.3 (stable), Akim Demaille, 2015/01/21
- Re: Bison 3.0.3 (stable), Thomas Jahns, 2015/01/22
- Re: Bison 3.0.3 (stable), Akim Demaille, 2015/01/22
- Re: Bison 3.0.3 (stable),
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: Bison 3.0.3 (stable), Thomas Jahns, 2015/01/20
- Re: Bison 3.0.3 (stable), Akim Demaille, 2015/01/20
Re: Bison 3.0.3 (stable), Akim Demaille, 2015/01/19