[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318
From: |
Brian Inglis |
Subject: |
Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318 |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Sep 2021 20:45:45 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 |
On 2021-09-14 10:09, Akim Demaille wrote:
Sorry for the slow response... I'm still hoping we could reproduce
this failure outside of Bison, so it took me quite some time to wrap a
tarball of gnulib with its test suite. My first attempt ran almost all
day long (C-c to rescue), and generated something like a 1GB
directory... My second attempt, with
./gnulib-tool --create-testdir --dir=./gnulib-with-tests
--single-configure --with-c++-tests --without-privileged-tests
was much faster: "just" about 2hrs :)
then, ./configure && make dist, and voilĂ , the following tarball:
https://www.lrde.epita.fr/~akim/private/bison/dummy-0.tar.gz
Could you please try it? With some luck, some tests will fail,
which we'll be able to report to gnulib.
Well I used my normal Cygwin packaging environment and process with
--debug flag to see some of the internals, and 43 tests failed, but I
can not see enough of the test details to figure out why l/dtoastr would
fail with permissions problems, and why other tests show the symptoms
they do?
The process took my system ~7.5 hours, and I attached all the relevant
logs I can find (sanitized for my protection, as I noticed some leakage
in previous logs).
Is there some other process I should perhaps use to build and test gnulib?
Santé!
--
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.
[Data in binary units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.]
dummy-logs.tar.xz
Description: Binary data
- bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Brian Inglis, 2021/09/12
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Brian Inglis, 2021/09/12
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Akim Demaille, 2021/09/13
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Brian Inglis, 2021/09/13
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Brian Inglis, 2021/09/13
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Brian Inglis, 2021/09/14
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Akim Demaille, 2021/09/14
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318,
Brian Inglis <=
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Akim Demaille, 2021/09/16
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Bruno Haible, 2021/09/16
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Brian Inglis, 2021/09/16
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Brian Inglis, 2021/09/16
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Brian Inglis, 2021/09/16
Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Brian Inglis, 2021/09/18
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Akim Demaille, 2021/09/18
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Bruno Haible, 2021/09/18
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Brian Inglis, 2021/09/18
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Bruno Haible, 2021/09/18