[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Testsuite summary for GNU Bison 3.8.2 : FAIL 2
From: |
Dennis Clarke |
Subject: |
Re: Testsuite summary for GNU Bison 3.8.2 : FAIL 2 |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Nov 2021 15:08:18 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:94.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/94.0 |
On 11/6/21 04:35, Akim Demaille wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
>
Good day Sir !
>> Le 4 nov. 2021 à 01:51, Dennis Clarke <dclarke@blastwave.org> a écrit :
>>
>> I have for you a pile of data.
>>
>> I don't want to bore you with a ton of details here but I will attach
>> a log file that explains everything.
>
> On the example side, we have:
>
>> "examples/c/bistromathic/parse.c", line 2023: warning: implicit function
>> declaration: strdup
>
> IOW, same problems as before. I have updated the commit to also apply
> to bistromathic, see below.
>
Yes, the exact same thing there.
> On the test suite side:
>
>> 613. torture.at:385: 613. Many lookahead tokens (torture.at:385): FAILED
>> (torture.at:394)
>
>> ./torture.at:394: $CC $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS -o input input.c $LIBS
>> stderr:
>> c99: Warning: Option -64 passed to ld, if ld is invoked, ignored otherwise
>> "input.c", line 17804: internal compiler error: Out of memory
>> c99: acomp failed for input.c
>
> I won't fight this.
>
I didn't even notice! I was really only looking at the first little
hurdle to jump over. However "out of memory"? Really?? I have to go
check on this silly situation. I think that hardware domain has 64GB
but then again it may be a small build/test thing. Either way, that is
bizarre.
>
>> 705. cxx-type.at:406: testing GLR: Resolve ambiguity, impure, no locations
>> ...
>> c99: Warning: Option -64 passed to ld, if ld is invoked, ignored otherwise
>> "types.y", line 188: warning: implicit function declaration: strdup
>
> Likewise 706, 707, 708, 709, 710, 711, 712, 713.
>
> So I will install the following commit to, imho, address all the failures,
> except test 613 from the test suite.
>
> The following tarball contains that commit. While at it, I have also updated
> gnulib. Could you please check it too?
>
> Thanks Dennis!
My pleasure. I am looking forwards to testing all this on a z/OS system
to see what happens there also. Those are totally horror show strict
standards compliance systems. First I will give this old SVR4 machine a
kick with your tarball.
--
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX and Linux spoken
GreyBeard and suspenders optional