bug-bison
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Testsuite summary for GNU Bison 3.8.2 : FAIL 2


From: Dennis Clarke
Subject: Re: Testsuite summary for GNU Bison 3.8.2 : FAIL 2
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 15:08:18 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:94.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/94.0

On 11/6/21 04:35, Akim Demaille wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
> 

Good day Sir !

>> Le 4 nov. 2021 à 01:51, Dennis Clarke <dclarke@blastwave.org> a écrit :
>>
>> I have for you a pile of data.
>>
>> I don't want to bore you with a ton of details here but I will attach
>> a log file that explains everything.
> 
> On the example side, we have:
> 
>> "examples/c/bistromathic/parse.c", line 2023: warning: implicit function 
>> declaration: strdup
> 
> IOW, same problems as before.  I have updated the commit to also apply
> to bistromathic, see below.
> 

Yes, the exact same thing there.

> On the test suite side:
> 
>> 613. torture.at:385: 613. Many lookahead tokens (torture.at:385): FAILED 
>> (torture.at:394)
> 
>> ./torture.at:394: $CC $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS  $LDFLAGS -o input input.c $LIBS
>> stderr:
>> c99: Warning: Option -64 passed to ld, if ld is invoked, ignored otherwise
>> "input.c", line 17804: internal compiler error: Out of memory
>> c99: acomp failed for input.c
> 
> I won't fight this.
>

I didn't even notice! I was really only looking at the first little
hurdle to jump over. However "out of memory"?  Really?? I have to go
check on this silly situation.  I think that hardware domain has 64GB
but then again it may be a small build/test thing. Either way, that is
bizarre.

> 
>> 705. cxx-type.at:406: testing GLR: Resolve ambiguity, impure, no locations 
>> ...
>> c99: Warning: Option -64 passed to ld, if ld is invoked, ignored otherwise
>> "types.y", line 188: warning: implicit function declaration: strdup
> 
> Likewise 706, 707, 708, 709, 710, 711, 712, 713.
> 
> So I will install the following commit to, imho, address all the failures,
> except test 613 from the test suite.
> 
> The following tarball contains that commit.  While at it, I have also updated
> gnulib.  Could you please check it too?
> 
> Thanks Dennis!

My pleasure. I am looking forwards to testing all this on a z/OS system
to see what happens there also.  Those are totally horror show strict
standards compliance systems.  First I will give this old SVR4 machine a
kick with your tarball.


-- 
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX and Linux spoken
GreyBeard and suspenders optional






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]