Re: C++ token move constructors/assignment with LALR

[Frank Heckenbach]

Akim Demaille wrote:

> > BTW, when checking this, I noticed there's a "void move" function
> > declared (actually 3 of them for different classes) in the skeletons
> > which I thought were involved here, but there doesn't seem to be any
> > definition of them. So these declarations may be remnants, and you
> > might want to remove them, Akim.
> 
> These functions are not C++ standard, they participate in Bison's effort to 
> have some form of move semantics in C98.

I see now. I had searched for the definitions by grepping for
"void[[:space:]]*move", but it didn't find them because they're
indented like

  void
  move ()

I know that's FSF coding style, but I was reminded again why I don't
like it ... ;)

Regards,
Frank