[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Current HEAD does not build
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: Current HEAD does not build |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 08:48:12 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.6 |
On Tuesday 13 February 2007, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Jim Meyering <address@hidden> writes:
> >> So, unless you're maintaining a cvs->git mirror of gnulib,
> >> you should not be looking in a git repo for that file.
> >
> > So who is maintaining git://git.sv.gnu.org/gnulib????
>
> It is not maintained. Rather, it is just a preview.
> I made that snapshot over a month ago, to give people an idea of what
> it'd be like. The goal is to switch upstream gnulib development from
> CVS to git. But it's likely to be disruptive, and there is no pressing
> need.
i guess the confusion is from the e-mail sent out about coreutils being moved
to git ... it ended with "gnulib is next" so the implied idea i read was that
it would happen soon so another e-mail wouldnt bother being sent out about it
oh well, not a big deal to change gnulib locally back to CVS
-mike
pgplJVBb0RQqn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Current HEAD does not build, Andreas Schwab, 2007/02/13
- Re: Current HEAD does not build, Jim Meyering, 2007/02/13
- Re: Current HEAD does not build, Andreas Schwab, 2007/02/13
- Re: Current HEAD does not build, Jim Meyering, 2007/02/13
- Re: Current HEAD does not build, Mike Frysinger, 2007/02/13
- Re: Current HEAD does not build, Jim Meyering, 2007/02/13
- Re: Current HEAD does not build, Andreas Schwab, 2007/02/13
- Re: Current HEAD does not build, Jim Meyering, 2007/02/13
- Re: Current HEAD does not build,
Mike Frysinger <=
- Re: Current HEAD does not build, Jim Meyering, 2007/02/13