[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Futile bug reports?
From: |
Stein A. Strømme |
Subject: |
Re: Futile bug reports? |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:22:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.103 |
[Bill Richter]
>>>>>> "RMS" == Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
|
> RMS> But since [Glickstein's proprietary Emacs book] is not free,
> RMS> please don't mention its existence to anyone. The way to
> RMS> encourage free documentation is by showing that non-free
> RMS> documentation isn't good enough.
|
| How can you show something "isn't good enough" if you don't ever
| "mention its existence to anyone"?
|
| Don't you have to say, Glickstein's proprietary Emacs book covers
| topic xxx, but the Emacs Lisp reference manual does a better job with
| it, or covers some topic yyy that Glickstein doesn't cover?
It's not good enough *because* it is not free.
--
Stein Arild Strømme <http://www.mi.uib.no/~stromme>
- Re: Futile bug reports?, (continued)
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Kai Großjohann, 2001/08/14
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/08/14
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/09
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Kai Großjohann, 2001/08/09
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Marcelo Dias de Toledo, 2001/08/09
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/11
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/12
- Re: Futile bug reports?,
Stein A. Strømme <=
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/13
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/13
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/14
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/14
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Raymond Zeitler, 2001/08/15
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/17
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/15
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/15
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/16
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Alan Mackenzie, 2001/08/16