[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:58:28 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> It may be suboptimal,
What is the optimal behaviour in your opinion?
> but at least it doesn't end up with a weird window arrangement
> displaying some randomly chosen old buffer.
The buffer is no longer randomly chosen. But now I see that Juri
objects to the result of that, sigh.
I don't agree that the window arrangement is "weird". I suppose if the
whole world continues to disagree with me, I will add
`calendar-split-width-threshold', default nil.
This whole exercise seems to have been a waste of time.
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Glenn Morris, 2009/10/02
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, martin rudalics, 2009/10/06
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Glenn Morris, 2009/10/06
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Stefan Monnier, 2009/10/06
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Juri Linkov, 2009/10/06
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Glenn Morris, 2009/10/06
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Juri Linkov, 2009/10/12
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Glenn Morris, 2009/10/12
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Juri Linkov, 2009/10/13
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Juri Linkov, 2009/10/14