[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#8857: display-buffer attempt to pop-up frame in batch mode causes "U
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#8857: display-buffer attempt to pop-up frame in batch mode causes "Unknown terminal type" error |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:08:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
> calendar/diary-lib.el:
>
> (let* ((pop-up-frames (or pop-up-frames
> (window-dedicated-p (selected-window))))
>
> mail/rmail.el:
>
> (and pop-up-frames (one-window-p))
>
> progmodes/inf-lisp.el:
>
> (let ((pop-up-frames
> ;; Be willing to use another frame
> ;; that already has the window in it.
> (or pop-up-frames
> (get-buffer-window inferior-lisp-buffer t))))
>
> vc/pcvs-util.el:
>
> (let ((pop-up-windows (or pop-up-windows pop-up-frames))
>
> ... just to mention a few.
I replaced most of these in my window-pub branch which, however, doesn't
care about 'unset value yet. Obviously, all of these don't DTRT in
Emacs 23 when a user has set `pop-up-frames' to 'graphic-only and is on
a non-graphic system.
> OK, I think I understand the motivation behind 'unset now.
'unset was a quick fix to make old code work with the new
`display-buffer'. There might be some yet unknown quirks in it. Maybe
I even don't need it.
> However, this
> effectively means that there really is no default value for
> pop-up-frames,
... well it's 'unset ...
> and every application can decide how they will deal with
> that. The snippets above will see it as non-nil and will now create
> frames.
Yes. Just as they wrongly handled 'graphic-only in Emacs 23.
> Right, the current code doesn't care about 'graphic-only, but neither
> does the old code care about 'unset. This can be changed, of course... :-)
This must be changed, of course :-)
> I actually don't feel that strongly about it. It just found it
> confusing, but I think I understand it better now. I have set this
> option to nil anyway. :-)
Me too. That's why I'm not very familiar with the ensuing problems.
martin
- bug#8857: display-buffer attempt to pop-up frame in batch mode causes "Unknown terminal type" error, (continued)
- bug#8857: display-buffer attempt to pop-up frame in batch mode causes "Unknown terminal type" error, David Engster, 2011/06/15
- bug#8857: display-buffer attempt to pop-up frame in batch mode causes "Unknown terminal type" error, martin rudalics, 2011/06/15
- bug#8857: display-buffer attempt to pop-up frame in batch mode causes "Unknown terminal type" error, David Engster, 2011/06/15
- bug#8857: display-buffer attempt to pop-up frame in batch mode causes "Unknown terminal type" error, martin rudalics, 2011/06/16
- bug#8857: display-buffer attempt to pop-up frame in batch mode causes "Unknown terminal type" error, David Engster, 2011/06/16
- bug#8857: display-buffer attempt to pop-up frame in batch mode causes "Unknown terminal type" error, martin rudalics, 2011/06/16
- bug#8857: display-buffer attempt to pop-up frame in batch mode causes "Unknown terminal type" error, David Engster, 2011/06/16
- bug#8857: display-buffer attempt to pop-up frame in batch mode causes "Unknown terminal type" error,
martin rudalics <=
- bug#8857: display-buffer attempt to pop-up frame in batch mode causes "Unknown terminal type" error, David Engster, 2011/06/17
- bug#8857: display-buffer attempt to pop-up frame in batch mode causes "Unknown terminal type" error, Stefan Monnier, 2011/06/16
- bug#8857: display-buffer attempt to pop-up frame in batch mode causes "Unknown terminal type" error, Stefan Monnier, 2011/06/15
- bug#8857: display-buffer attempt to pop-up frame in batch mode causes "Unknown terminal type" error, Glenn Morris, 2011/06/15
- bug#8857: display-buffer attempt to pop-up frame in batch mode causes "Unknown terminal type" error, Stefan Monnier, 2011/06/15
- bug#8857: display-buffer attempt to pop-up frame in batch mode causes "Unknown terminal type" error, Glenn Morris, 2011/06/15