[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:30:25 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6 |
On 06/06/13 09:36, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Since it's only used in buffer.c it should be moved there.
Yes, that's a win, as it makes it clearer to the human
reader that the function is used and needed only by one
module, and it simplifies lisp.h. Attached is a patch to do that
systematically for lisp.h; it assumes the patch I sent out earlier today
<http://bugs.gnu.org/11935#110>. A side effect is that
this gives GCC -O2 a bit more chance to optimize, shrinking
the executable by 3k on my x86-64 platform.
inline4o.diff
Description: Text Data
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/06
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Andreas Schwab, 2013/06/06
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions,
Paul Eggert <=
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/06
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/08
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/09
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/09
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/13
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/13
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/15