[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#17589: 24.3.91; lisp/frameset.el
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
bug#17589: 24.3.91; lisp/frameset.el |
Date: |
Wed, 28 May 2014 06:55:02 +0200 |
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Stefan Monnier
<monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
> Or to always save window-state in a "non-writable" form, and then
> provide a separate function to turn this into a writable form. If we
> can always know right from the start if we'll write the window-state,
> then we don't need that, but if we may sometimes need a window-state
> which we may or may not later write to a file, then a separate function
> would be needed.
I thought of it, but then that "carries over" to framesets, and
suddenly you need a function to make a frameset writable, as they
would by default be non-writable (because, as this bug shows, you do
not know beforehand if you will want to write a frameset or not). Very
ugly, IMO.
J
- bug#17589: 24.3.91; lisp/frameset.el, (continued)
- bug#17589: 24.3.91; lisp/frameset.el, Stefan Monnier, 2014/05/27
- bug#17589: 24.3.91; lisp/frameset.el, Arash Cue, 2014/05/27
- bug#17589: 24.3.91; lisp/frameset.el, martin rudalics, 2014/05/27
- bug#17589: 24.3.91; lisp/frameset.el, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/05/27
- bug#17589: 24.3.91; lisp/frameset.el, Arash Cue, 2014/05/27
- bug#17589: 24.3.91; lisp/frameset.el, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/05/28
- bug#17589: 24.3.91; lisp/frameset.el, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/05/28
- bug#17589: 24.3.91; lisp/frameset.el, Arash Cue, 2014/05/28
- bug#17589: 24.3.91; lisp/frameset.el, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/05/29
- bug#17589: 24.3.91; lisp/frameset.el, Stefan Monnier, 2014/05/27
- bug#17589: 24.3.91; lisp/frameset.el,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- bug#17589: 24.3.91; lisp/frameset.el, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/05/28
- bug#17589: 24.3.91; lisp/frameset.el, Stefan Monnier, 2014/05/28
- bug#17589: 24.3.91; lisp/frameset.el, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/05/29