[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#20552: 24.4; cc
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#20552: 24.4; cc |
Date: |
Thu, 14 May 2015 12:13:58 +0200 |
> As you wrote it there is no difference. (left . 0) remains
> about 1/8 inch right of flush left (even if executed twice). BUT
>
> (modify-frame-parameters nil '((user-position . t) (width . 176)
> (left . -1300))
>
> does become flush left on an initial emacs -Q whereas without the
> user-position (which I will now read about) it required two executions
> to become flush left. Recall, previously the first execution left the frame
> several inches right of flush left but a second execution made it flush
> left.
Still weird. What happens with
(modify-frame-parameters nil '((user-position . t) (width . 176) (left . 1)))
Also, you could try playing with the `(+ POS)' and `(- POS)' position
specifications (see section 28.3.3.2 Position Parameters of the Elisp
manual).
martin
- bug#20552: 24.4; cc, gottlieb, 2015/05/11
- bug#20552: 24.4; cc, martin rudalics, 2015/05/12
- Message not available
- bug#20552: 24.4; cc, martin rudalics, 2015/05/13
- bug#20552: 24.4; cc, gottlieb, 2015/05/13
- bug#20552: 24.4; cc, gottlieb, 2015/05/13
- bug#20552: 24.4; cc,
martin rudalics <=
- bug#20552: 24.4; cc, gottlieb, 2015/05/14
- bug#20552: 24.4; cc, martin rudalics, 2015/05/15
- Message not available
- bug#20552: 24.4; cc, martin rudalics, 2015/05/19
- Message not available
- bug#20552: 24.4; cc, martin rudalics, 2015/05/20
- bug#20552: 24.4; cc, gottlieb, 2015/05/14