[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#22564: Fundamental mode isn't fundamental enough.
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
bug#22564: Fundamental mode isn't fundamental enough. |
Date: |
6 Feb 2016 11:21:10 -0000 |
User-agent: |
tin/2.3.1-20141224 ("Tallant") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/10.2-RELEASE-p9 (amd64)) |
Hello, Mark.
In article <mailman.3712.1454686507.843.bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> you wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:
>>> No, it's a deliberate feature, AFAIU.
>> You mean, there should no longer be a vanilla fundamental mode? I would
>> argue that no "helpful" electric modes should be enabled in FM. At the
>> moment, it appears, we are lacking a What-You-Do-Is-What-You-Get mode.
>> I think electric-*-modes should be disabled in FM unless explicitly
>> enabled by the user in an FM buffer. We've become far too "clever" with
>> all these facilities.
> electric-indent-mode is the only electric-*-mode on by default, and I
> never understood why it was enabled. Up until bracketed paste was
> implemented, this issue of indenting pastes had been an annoyance (only
> later on did I realize to disable this electric mode).
What is "bracketed paste"? The term appears only in xterm.el, but that
file doesn't say what it is.
I still think it's a bug that a standard OS paste operation doesn't work
out of the box in a non-specialised buffer.
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- bug#22564: Fundamental mode isn't fundamental enough., (continued)
- Message not available
- bug#22564: Fundamental mode isn't fundamental enough.,
Alan Mackenzie <=
- bug#22564: Fundamental mode isn't fundamental enough., Achim Gratz, 2016/02/06
- bug#22564: Fundamental mode isn't fundamental enough., Achim Gratz, 2016/02/07
- bug#22564: Fundamental mode isn't fundamental enough., Achim Gratz, 2016/02/08
- bug#22564: Fundamental mode isn't fundamental enough., Achim Gratz, 2016/02/08
- bug#22564: Fundamental mode isn't fundamental enough., Achim Gratz, 2016/02/08