|
From: | Andreas Röhler |
Subject: | bug#24353: 25.1.1: looking-back wrong info |
Date: | Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:57:53 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.2.0 |
On 02.09.2016 10:58, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
From: Andreas Röhler <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 10:48:39 +0200 Wrong advertised-calling-convention From subr.el: looking-back declares optional argument LIMIT mandatory. Such calling-convention deserves a place in doku, but should not send wrong info out of didacticsAre you saying that using advertised-calling-convention is wrong everywhere,
In the way it's implemented, seems a bad idea everywhere. It cheats the user delivering wrong resp. incomplete signatures.If certain usages are discouraged, that might be told in docstring, by re-writing the function etc.
or just in this one case? If the latter, what is special about this function? Thanks.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |