[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Dec 2017 20:01:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
>> Cc: 29785@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org
>> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 17:50:34 +0100
>>
>> >> So do I, but I don't want to elicit any 'how dare you change
>> >> behaviour' comments a year from now.
>> >
>> > The behavior doesn't change, though.
>>
>> As currently proposed, no. But if I enabled the separate history
>> unconditionally then it would.
>
> No, it won't. M-p and M-n would still work as they did before.
The history list they would cycle through would be the eww history
list, not the global minibuffer history list. What am I missing?
Robert
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Robert Pluim, 2017/12/20
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2017/12/20
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Robert Pluim, 2017/12/20
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/12/20
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Robert Pluim, 2017/12/20
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/12/20
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history,
Robert Pluim <=
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/12/20
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Robert Pluim, 2017/12/21
bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/12/20