[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#33258: inhibit-select-window
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#33258: inhibit-select-window |
Date: |
Thu, 08 Nov 2018 09:52:32 +0100 |
> So to rule out non-interactive callers of vc-diff we need to check
> for (eq this-command 'vc-diff)?
For example.
> But there is a simpler and safer solution that I already mentioned:
> to restore an original window in post-command-hook. Or even better
> using your new window-state-change-functions: when inhibit-select-window
> was found in an alist from display-buffer-alist then check whether
> the selected window was changed in an alist of changes provided by
> window-state-change-functions and restore an old selected window.
In either case let's get 'display-buffer' out of this. After all, its
doc-string says
"Display BUFFER-OR-NAME in some window, without selecting it."
so we'd be preaching to the choir here. We might call it
'pop-to-buffer-no-select'.
martin
- bug#33258: inhibit-select-window, Juri Linkov, 2018/11/04
- bug#33258: inhibit-select-window, martin rudalics, 2018/11/05
- bug#33258: inhibit-select-window, Juri Linkov, 2018/11/05
- bug#33258: inhibit-select-window, martin rudalics, 2018/11/06
- bug#33258: inhibit-select-window, Juri Linkov, 2018/11/06
- bug#33258: inhibit-select-window, martin rudalics, 2018/11/07
- bug#33258: inhibit-select-window, Juri Linkov, 2018/11/07
- bug#33258: inhibit-select-window,
martin rudalics <=
- bug#33258: inhibit-select-window, Juri Linkov, 2018/11/08