[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#20609: 25.0.50; How to I easily generate the "action stamp" given a
From: |
Noam Postavsky |
Subject: |
bug#20609: 25.0.50; How to I easily generate the "action stamp" given a commit hash? |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Oct 2019 08:53:44 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se> writes:
> Noam Postavsky <npostavs@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
>
>> I would like to propose doing away with this "action stamp" thing. It
>> is okay for its original purpose: an almost-guaranteed-unique identifier
>> for an automated repository format conversion tool. But it is not very
>> human-readable. It is fairly awkward to come up with a git command that
>> comes up with the correct UTC timestamp. We hardly use it anyway.
I can add to this, it's not entirely clear whether the timestamp is
committer or author. https://gitlab.com/esr/reposurgeon/issues/144
>> Giving just the date (no timestamp) plus summary line should be unique
>> enough, and is very human readable.
>
> Nothing has happened here in two years,
There was some discussion on emacs-devel,
https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-devel/2018-07/msg00461.html
> but I think it's a good idea to get rid of action stamps and replace
> them with something that we can easily generate. Noam's proposal
> seems to solve that.
Yeah, I'm still inclined to remove action stamps. I guess we should
also add a way to easily generate date + summary given a commit hash
(giving the the git repo may be needed as well, e.g., for cases where
your mail buffer doesn't live in the git repository you're talking
about).
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#20609: 25.0.50; How to I easily generate the "action stamp" given a commit hash?,
Noam Postavsky <=