[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#29550: 27.0.50; `not-modified' should be disabled by default
From: |
Göktuğ Kayaalp |
Subject: |
bug#29550: 27.0.50; `not-modified' should be disabled by default |
Date: |
Fri, 04 Oct 2019 21:38:32 +0300 |
On 2019-09-29 12:05 +02, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:
> Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> writes:
>> How about adding a command that reenables all disabled commands?
> That's possible, but I was also wondering whether there should be an
> "emacs -Q-but-not-so-much" (or whatever) switch to Emacs, or a standard
> common-maintainer-things.el file one could load.
>
> But that's probably an endless rabbit hole to go down into, so I think
> we should just settle on saying "-l my-maintainer-things.el"
> individually for whatever we think is too annoying to deal with when
> testing with -Q.
Or, a flag like --maintainer-mode that enables all commands _and_
implies -Q and "-l $EMACS_MAINTAINER_RC" if found?
Frankly, I see no reason this issue is controversial: the command has
caused data loss for multiple people; accidental data loss and data
corruption is the worst thing that can happen to you in personal
computing, and accidentally hitting M-~ causes accidental data
loss/corruption in a very confusing way. "(emacs) Disabling" states:
> The purpose of disabling a command is to prevent users from executing
> it by accident; we do this for commands that might be confusing to the
> uninitiated.
In this light, it’s rather obvious what to do: protect users by
disabling this command. The sole argument for keeping it enabled is
essentially the convenience of a single person.
Also, something like this
emacs -Q -e "(enable-command 'not-modified)"
works for Eli’s case, you could just alias it to something like ‘emacsq’
or ‘emacs-Q’.
--
İ. Göktuğ Kayaalp <https://www.gkayaalp.com/>
024C 30DD 597D 142B 49AC
40EB 465C D949 B101 2427
- bug#29550: 27.0.50; `not-modified' should be disabled by default,
Göktuğ Kayaalp <=