bug#19217: 25.0.50; `C-M-x' (`eval-defun') on a `defface' that is not top-level

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> To recap, this allows `C-x C-e' on defvar/defface to work the same as
> `C-M-x' on those (when they are top-level).
>
> That these two work differently is a source of frustration, so I think
> it makes conceptual sense, but I'm not sure what the repercussions would
> be otherwise...

There were no protests, so I've now gone ahead and done this.  This may
perhaps be controversial, but I've never understood why `C-x C-e'
shouldn't do "the obvious thing" on defvar (etc) forms, so I've done it
anyway.

However, if this somehow gets in the way of people's way of working, it
could be reversed, I guess.  

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no