[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#44018: Don't consider play-sound-file to be a 'safe' function
From: |
Mattias Engdegård |
Subject: |
bug#44018: Don't consider play-sound-file to be a 'safe' function |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:36:50 +0100 |
26 okt. 2020 kl. 19.28 skrev Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>:
> So you are saying 'message' is not safe because it could be used to
> display text that isn't "innocuous"? In that case, we should also
> remove from the list 'error' and 'signal', no?
That's a good point. Perhaps we should.
There doesn't seem to be much point in permitting 'while' either in the absence
of mutation, but I don't think it's actively harmful. I could be wrong.
bug#44018: Don't consider play-sound-file to be a 'safe' function, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/10/16
- bug#44018: Don't consider play-sound-file to be a 'safe' function, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/16
- bug#44018: Don't consider play-sound-file to be a 'safe' function, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2020/10/26
- bug#44018: Don't consider play-sound-file to be a 'safe' function, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/26
- bug#44018: Don't consider play-sound-file to be a 'safe' function, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/10/26
- bug#44018: Don't consider play-sound-file to be a 'safe' function, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/26
- bug#44018: Don't consider play-sound-file to be a 'safe' function,
Mattias Engdegård <=
- bug#44018: Don't consider play-sound-file to be a 'safe' function, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/31
- bug#44018: Don't consider play-sound-file to be a 'safe' function, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/10/31