[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names
From: |
積丹尼 Dan Jacobson |
Subject: |
bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Feb 2021 19:55:45 +0800 |
$ emacs -nw -Q --eval '(progn(switch-to-buffer "xbp")(switch-to-buffer
"xbq")(switch-to-buffer "m"))'
b ;; self-insert-command
TAB ;; minibuffer-complete
gives:
-UUU:----F1 m All L1 (Fundamental) -------------
In this buffer, type RET to select the completion near point.
Possible completions are:
xbp
xbq
-UUU:%*--F1 *Completions* All L1 (Completion List) --------
Switch to buffer (default xbq): b
What is bugging me is that in the *completions* buffer, the x is added
to the front, properly. But in the minibuffer it is missing.
Yes I didn't type "x", but still, emacs should put it in the minibuffer
for me. Emacs will eventually, but it would be better sooner than later.
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson, 2021/02/07
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/08
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson, 2021/02/09
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/09
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson, 2021/02/09
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/10
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names,
積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <=
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/10
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson, 2021/02/10