bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#46400: bug#45375: cc-mode indentation sometimes doesn't work


From: Alan Mackenzie
Subject: bug#46400: bug#45375: cc-mode indentation sometimes doesn't work
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 14:39:27 +0000

Hello, Basil, Géza and Konstantin.

Sorry I missed this bug report in December, and thanks, Basil, for
drawing it to my attention.

On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 21:17:56 +0000, Basil L. Contovounesios wrote:
> reassign 45375 emacs,cc-mode
> quit

> [CCed CC Mode maintainer.]

> Herman@debbugs.gnu.org, Géza <geza.herman@gmail.com> writes:

> > On current master (6af31fd71ff1a403c199c479577bcc145a547db1) indentation of
> > C/C++ files sometimes doesn't work. I've bisected it: commit "9022df7027
> > Optimise c-parse-state for large buffers with few (if any) braces." 
> > introduced
> > this behavior.

> > This is how to reproduce: check out 
> > 9022df70270243f211c54ccd66800320148b8434,
> > and execute "emacs -Q xdisp.c". Jump to line 2989 with M-g M-g 2989, move 
> > the
> > cursor to the end of line of "Lisp_Object retval;", and press enter. The 
> > cursor
> > will be moved to the correct place (correctly indented, cursor will be 
> > placed
> > below the 'L' character of the previous line). Then push enter at end of 
> > line of
> > "va_list ap;". For me, cursor will jump to the beginning of the line, it 
> > won't
> > be indented. If I keep pressing enters, the next failure will be at "va_end
> > (ap);". I'm not sure whether this exact steps reproduces for everyone, but 
> > it
> > happened me 5 of 5 trials. If I don't press enter at the first line
> > ("Lisp_Object retval;"), the problem doesn't happen for any of this function
> > lines. But it will happen for somewhere else, if I keep trying (move around 
> > the
> > file, press enter at random places: if will fail sooner or later).

> > For my configuration (without -Q), this problem happens quite frequently 
> > during
> > editing C++ code.

> I tried following your recipe (the lines in xdisp.c have since moved
> around a bit), but was unable to reproduce the issue.

> Can you still reproduce it on your end?

I can reproduce it easily on the indicated commit, and I have found
where the problem is.  It's in the handling of the c-state-cache (the
cache which tracks the positions of certain
braces/brackets/parentheses).  Fixing it could be quite tricky,
particularly given the need to retain optimisation for the case that the
above commit "fixed".

I am fairly, but not absolutely, sure that this is the same bug as
46400, but the bug scenario here is easier to reproduce than the other
one, so I will concentrate on this bug first.  Maybe we can join the bug
reports later.

> Thanks,

> -- 
> Basil

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]