[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#46735: Major Mode Bindings Starting With ... "looks" very ordered
|
From: |
積丹尼 Dan Jacobson |
|
Subject: |
bug#46735: Major Mode Bindings Starting With ... "looks" very ordered |
|
Date: |
Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:27:12 +0800 |
"Major Mode Bindings Starting With ..." "looks" very ordered, but actually
isn't!
Proof that W C-h (ran from gnus summary buffer) is not ordered.
W E s gnus-article-strip-leading-space
W E t gnus-article-remove-trailing-blank-lines
W E w gnus-article-remove-leading-whitespace
W T e gnus-article-date-lapsed
W T i gnus-article-date-iso8601
W T l gnus-article-date-local
W T o gnus-article-date-original
W T p gnus-article-date-english
W T s gnus-article-date-user
W T u gnus-article-date-ut
W T z gnus-article-date-ut
W M b gnus-article-view-part
W M c gnus-article-decode-charset
W M h gnus-mime-buttonize-attachments-in-header
Sure, "Emacs never said it was ordered."
Yeah but then why trick people with 99% ordered output?
- bug#46735: Major Mode Bindings Starting With ... "looks" very ordered,
積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <=