bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#48500: 28.0.50; url-retrieve-synchronously exits abnormally due to p


From: Shane Mulligan
Subject: bug#48500: 28.0.50; url-retrieve-synchronously exits abnormally due to pending keyboard input from terminal
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 18:48:09 +1200

I may have resolved this issue with the following patch to `url-retrieve-synchronously`.
What this achieves is to trigger a `quit` in a controlled environment rather than allowing it to occur when `accept-process-output` is run.
It's not always wanted to trigger a quit when `(input-pending-p)` is `t`. But I noticed from placing `while-no-input` around `accept-process-output` to avoid the `quit` that `url-retrieve-synchronously` would then hang but with the controlled `quit` happening beforehand, `accept-process-output` no longer needs `while-no-input` around it. The end result is buttery smooth helm with no accidental `quit` from typing too fast. I think this may have resulted in GUI helm faster too.

```
29c29,30
<       (let ((proc (get-buffer-process asynch-buffer)))
---
>       (let ((proc (get-buffer-process asynch-buffer))
>             (counter 0))
71a73,78
>             (with-local-quit
>               (if (input-pending-p)
>                   (progn
>                     (setq counter (1+ counter))
>                     (if (> counter 20)
>                         (keyboard-quit)))))
```
Shane Mulligan


On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 11:32 AM Shane Mulligan <mullikine@gmail.com> wrote:
My apologies. It was literally 5am when I wrote that. I think I have misunderstood `C-g` being generated with `quit-flag`. The bad behaviour is very clearly still happening. I will try to clarify this problem further by experimenting with it. I need to figure out why `while-no-input` suppresses the `quit` but merely setting `quit-flag` does not. Something indirect may be happening. 

Thank you all,
Shane Mulligan


On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 4:54 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> From: Shane Mulligan <mullikine@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 04:32:16 +1200
>
> Thanks for looking into this so quickly. First some background on the problem. I managed to work through
> this issue (https://github.com/emacs-helm/helm/issues/2417) with the `emacs-helm` maintainer and we
> found what appears to be that the call to `accept-process-output` inside of `url-retrieve-synchronously` will
> generate a `C-g` when there is pending input of any char. As far as I can tell this is an issue only with
> terminal emacs. As I understand it, `inhibit-quit`, as used in `accept-process-output` allows a `C-g` to be
> propagated outwards and handled and from what I can see by the comments surrounding,
>
> ```
>               ;; accept-process-output returned nil, maybe because the process
>               ;; exited (and may have been replaced with another).  If we got
>               ;; a quit, just stop.
> ```
>
> the `C-g` in this case is expected.
>
> But I wonder if `C-g` was meant to be generated if the user was simply mashing keys on the keyboard.  In
> this case, the `C-g` emanating from `accept-process-output` was bubbling up into `helm` and `helm` was
> treating it like an error.
>
> Here, you can see a quit being generated from the visual cue in the minibuffer.
> https://asciinema.org/a/nAIB8Z1lGgZJqJg9Mt8YiNEM9
>
> Here, I have added `while-no-input` and I no longer get the `quit`.
> https://asciinema.org/a/x9ELZhwDP1IUtmOz0M1cly42H
>
> However, as I test the addition of `while-no-input` with `helm-google-suggest` (as above), though Quit is no
> longer being generated from mashing keys, the key input which would have generated the `quit` is not
> immediately shown in `helm`. Instead, it only appears on the next key press. So my implementation may not
> be perfect or complete.
>
> Finding the solution would make the minibuffer far less interrupted while typing when
> `url-retrieve-synchronously` is used in the background.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Shane Mulligan

Please in the future send your responses with the bug address,
48500@debbugs.gnu.org, on the CC list, so that others will see your
detailed descriptions.  I won't have time to take a good look into
that in the next few days, so it's good to make others aware of your
findings, because they might look into it meanwhile.

Personally, I find it very strange that typing on the keyboard
produces C-g, it shouldn't happen, neither on a TTY nor on a GUI
display.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]