[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#48478: 28.0.50; yank-from-kill-ring and kill-ring-yank-pointer
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#48478: 28.0.50; yank-from-kill-ring and kill-ring-yank-pointer |
Date: |
Sun, 23 May 2021 10:19:49 +0300 |
> From: Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>
> Cc: 48478@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 23:59:31 +0300
>
> >> For the case of not adding the edited entry to the kill-ring,
> >> now kill-ring-yank-pointer stays at the same position it was
> >> before the editing.
> >
> > It doesn't look like that in my testing. Here's the recipe:
> >
> > emacs -Q
> > For the words "buffer", "text", "Lisp", and "evaluation" from the
> > first line, mark each word and then M-w
> > M->
> > M-y
> > Type "tex TAB", which will expand to "text"
> > Type "oize RET", which will insert "textoize"
> > Type C-y
> > This inserts the last kill, which is "evaluation", whereas I
> > expected to see "text", since you said the pointer stays at the
> > same position.
>
> The pointer kill-ring-yank-pointer stays at the same position:
> before M-y, kill-ring-yank-pointer points to "evaluation",
> and after M-y, kill-ring-yank-pointer points to "evaluation".
I think this is not the optimal behavior. The optimal behavior IMO is
if M-y would yield the same results wrt kill-ring-yank-pointer as does
M-y after C-y. IOW, it would be natural if M-y invoked after a
non-yank command would just allow a "direct access" to a specific slot
of the kill-ring, and would otherwise work like M-y after a yank
command. Once again, from user's POV M-y is the same command, so
every subtle change in the results is IMO a disadvantage, if the
change is not a direct consequence of the differences in use cases.
If you want yank-from-kill-ring to leave kill-ring-yank-pointer
unaltered, we could move the pointer in yank-pop, after
yank-from-kill-ring returns. WDYT?
- bug#48478: 28.0.50; yank-from-kill-ring and kill-ring-yank-pointer, (continued)
- bug#48478: 28.0.50; yank-from-kill-ring and kill-ring-yank-pointer, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/20
- bug#48478: 28.0.50; yank-from-kill-ring and kill-ring-yank-pointer, Juri Linkov, 2021/05/20
- bug#48478: 28.0.50; yank-from-kill-ring and kill-ring-yank-pointer, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/20
- bug#48478: 28.0.50; yank-from-kill-ring and kill-ring-yank-pointer, Juri Linkov, 2021/05/20
- bug#48478: 28.0.50; yank-from-kill-ring and kill-ring-yank-pointer, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/20
- bug#48478: 28.0.50; yank-from-kill-ring and kill-ring-yank-pointer, Juri Linkov, 2021/05/20
- bug#48478: 28.0.50; yank-from-kill-ring and kill-ring-yank-pointer, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/21
- bug#48478: 28.0.50; yank-from-kill-ring and kill-ring-yank-pointer, Juri Linkov, 2021/05/21
- bug#48478: 28.0.50; yank-from-kill-ring and kill-ring-yank-pointer, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/22
- bug#48478: 28.0.50; yank-from-kill-ring and kill-ring-yank-pointer, Juri Linkov, 2021/05/22
- bug#48478: 28.0.50; yank-from-kill-ring and kill-ring-yank-pointer,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#48478: 28.0.50; yank-from-kill-ring and kill-ring-yank-pointer, Juri Linkov, 2021/05/25
- bug#48478: 28.0.50; yank-from-kill-ring and kill-ring-yank-pointer, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/26
- bug#48478: 28.0.50; yank-from-kill-ring and kill-ring-yank-pointer, Juri Linkov, 2021/05/26
- bug#48478: 28.0.50; yank-from-kill-ring and kill-ring-yank-pointer, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/27
- bug#48478: 28.0.50; yank-from-kill-ring and kill-ring-yank-pointer, Juri Linkov, 2021/05/30
- bug#48478: 28.0.50; yank-from-kill-ring and kill-ring-yank-pointer, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/31
- bug#48478: 28.0.50; yank-from-kill-ring and kill-ring-yank-pointer, Juri Linkov, 2021/05/31
- bug#48478: 28.0.50; yank-from-kill-ring and kill-ring-yank-pointer, Juri Linkov, 2021/05/30
- bug#48478: 28.0.50; yank-from-kill-ring and kill-ring-yank-pointer, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/31
- bug#48478: 28.0.50; yank-from-kill-ring and kill-ring-yank-pointer, Juri Linkov, 2021/05/31