bug#48841: [PATCH] Make fido-mode about as fast as ido-mode even with many completions

[João Távora]

João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:

> [I've removed bug#47711 from the list, since I haven't read the bug.
> This is only directly concerned with this report bug#48841 about speed
> differences between fido-mode and ido-mode.]
>
> João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> scratch/icomplete-lazy-highlight-attempt-2, although still incomplete,
>> is one such approach, though it still sets `completion-score` on the
>> "shared" string, used later for sorting.  But also that could be
>> prevented (again, only if it turns out to be actually problematic
>> IMO).
>
> I have tested the patch more thoroughly now, and have not found any
> problems.

As I wait for genuine reports or explanations of the much dramatized
problems in the above patch, I've pushed a much simpler patch that has a
dramatic beneficial effect: simply don't do any copying, highlighting or
scoring if the pcm-style pattern (used by the styles 'flex', 'substring'
and others) is empty.

This more than halves the waiting time for the candidate display when
the pattern is empty.  As far as i can tell, `fido-mode` is now faster
than `ido-mode` and so I'm marking this bug closed.

Of course, when there is a pattern of a single character or more, the
icomplete waiting times using my earlier 'completion-lazy-highlight'
patch are still around 70% of the current master.  But those times are
always quite shorter than the empty-pattern case.  I'll wait a bit for
the alternatives presumably being worked on before pushing that or
something based on it.

João