[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#49592: 28.0.50; lisp-current-defun-name and non-standard defuns
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
bug#49592: 28.0.50; lisp-current-defun-name and non-standard defuns |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:29:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> writes:
> Should we make the "fall back: display the name of the first symbol
> after opening paren" case look different from the standard case?
>
> For which-func display in the mode-line I'd find "(progn ...)" nice,
> but I guess that would not be suitable for the "add-log" case.
Ah, I'd forgotten -- yes, that'd look better, but we'd have to rearrange
the calling sequence a bit since, as you say, we don't want that in the
add-log case.
Or perhaps we could add a hack like adding a text property to the string
to let which-func know that it should wrap the result in "( ...)"?
- bug#49592: 28.0.50; lisp-current-defun-name and non-standard defuns, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/04
- bug#49592: 28.0.50; lisp-current-defun-name and non-standard defuns, Michael Heerdegen, 2022/08/04
- bug#49592: 28.0.50; lisp-current-defun-name and non-standard defuns, Michael Heerdegen, 2022/08/04
- bug#49592: 28.0.50; lisp-current-defun-name and non-standard defuns, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/05
- bug#49592: 28.0.50; lisp-current-defun-name and non-standard defuns, Michael Heerdegen, 2022/08/05
- bug#49592: 28.0.50; lisp-current-defun-name and non-standard defuns, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/06
- bug#49592: 28.0.50; lisp-current-defun-name and non-standard defuns, Michael Heerdegen, 2022/08/06
- bug#49592: 28.0.50; lisp-current-defun-name and non-standard defuns, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/08
- bug#49592: 28.0.50; lisp-current-defun-name and non-standard defuns, Michael Heerdegen, 2022/08/08
- bug#49592: 28.0.50; lisp-current-defun-name and non-standard defuns,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- bug#49592: 28.0.50; lisp-current-defun-name and non-standard defuns, Michael Heerdegen, 2022/08/12
- bug#49592: 28.0.50; lisp-current-defun-name and non-standard defuns, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/12
- bug#49592: 28.0.50; lisp-current-defun-name and non-standard defuns, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/23
- bug#49592: 28.0.50; lisp-current-defun-name and non-standard defuns, Michael Heerdegen, 2022/08/23
- bug#49592: 28.0.50; lisp-current-defun-name and non-standard defuns, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/24