|
From: | Gregory Heytings |
Subject: | bug#56682: locked narrowing |
Date: | Thu, 01 Dec 2022 21:15:23 +0000 |
Yes, it's a compromise. As I explained above, the only other possible compromise that is safe enough is to make _all_ buffers "suffer" (but suffer less).
That's perhaps not clear enough, it would be better phrased as follows: "the only other possible compromise that is safe enough is to make _all_ buffers "suffer" (suffer more often, but suffer less than large buffers suffer with the alternative)".
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |