bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#59807: 29.0.60; [PATCH] python-ts-mode does not auto-complete the cl


From: Theodor Thornhill
Subject: bug#59807: 29.0.60; [PATCH] python-ts-mode does not auto-complete the closing quote
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2022 09:07:28 +0100


On 4 December 2022 08:28:23 CET, Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Dec 3, 2022, at 11:19 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> From: Kai Ma <justksqsf@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2022 06:27:18 +0800
>>> 
>>> When electric-pair-mode is enabled, a single quote ' should be auto
>>> completed to be '' (which means an empty string).  Python-mode correctly
>>> does this, but python-ts-mode does not.  This is clearly a problem
>>> regarding the syntax table.
>>> 
>>> The attached patch makes python-ts-mode uses the same syntax table as
>>> python-mode's, and fixes this problem.  I also checked a few other ts
>>> modes, and some also have this issue.  For example, js-ts-mode does not
>>> auto complete '' either, which is also fixed by this patch.
>>> 
>>>> From 7f996826bc47bcdd155eb0cc220a48c32cb2619a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Kai Ma <justksqsf@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2022 06:15:42 +0800
>>> Subject: [PATCH] Fix syntax tables of tree-sitter modes
>>> 
>>> Tree-sitter modes should use the same syntax table as the
>>> non-tree-sitter ones.
>>> * lisp/progmodes/csharp-mode.el (csharp-mode-syntax-table)
>>> (csharp-mode):
>>> * lisp/progmodes/js.el (js-mode-syntax-table) (js-ts-mode):
>>> * lisp/progmodes/python.el (python-ts-mode):
>>> * lisp/progmodes/sh-script.el (bash-ts-mode):
>>> * lisp/textmodes/css-mode.el (css-ts-mode):
>> 
>> Thanks, but please format the log message according to our conventions:
>> there should be a description of the actual changes after the last colon.
>> 
>> Yuan, is it really true that the syntax tables in treesit-supported modes
>> should be always identical to those of the non-treesit modes?  Or maybe
>> there could be subtle differences?
>
>IMO yes. But since I’m not the original author of some of the modes, I 
>included Theo for his opinion.
>
>Yuan
>

I agree!
Theo





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]