bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#59314: 29.0.50; EUDC and message-mode header completion


From: Thomas Fitzsimmons
Subject: bug#59314: 29.0.50; EUDC and message-mode header completion
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2022 20:51:13 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

Alexander Adolf <alexander.adolf@condition-alpha.com> writes:

> Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim@fitzsim.org> writes:
>
>>> [...]
>>> Looking at this now.
>>
>> Great, thank you.
>> [...]
>
> With the default value of `completion-styles`, which is
>
>      '(basic partial-completion emacs22)
>
> I get no completion. But when setting it to
>
>      '(substring partial-completion)
>
> as I mentioned, I get this after calling `completion-at-point:`
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> To:  <emacs-ert-test-
> Subject: 
> From: Alexander Adolf <alexanderadolf@laptop.fritz.box>
> --text follows this line--
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Which I guess is kind of the expected result, as it inserts the longest
> common prefix of the two candidates' email addresses.
>
> I get the same result with `message-tab` (or just pressing TAB), btw.
>
> Actually, I think the leading "<" should not be there? After appending
> either "3", or "4" further completion attempts (using either function)
> do not provide any results. But when I remove the leading "<", and try
> to complete again (with either "3" or "4" added), I get the correct
> result (for instance "Emacs ERT4 <emacs-ert-test-4@bbdb.gnu.org>").
>
> Thus, it seems there are two things to further look into :
>
> - set `completion-styles` to '(substring partial-completion) during the
>   test
>
> - make sure the leading "<" is not inserted when there is a partial
>   match

Confirmed, adding substring to completion-styles, anywhere in the list, e.g.:

(setq completion-styles '(basic substring partial-completion emacs22))

results in the behaviour you describe.  We need to make this work with
the default completion-styles setting though.

I wonder where the leading " <" comes from (a space character is also
inserted, before the '<').

Thomas





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]