bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#59900: 30.0.50; map pattern in pcase causes a byte-compile error


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: bug#59900: 30.0.50; map pattern in pcase causes a byte-compile error
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 21:06:46 +0200

> From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de>
> Cc: akira.komamura@gmail.com,  59900@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 19:02:32 +0100
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > Thanks, but all this still doesn't answer my questions,
> > unfortunately.  You-all are describing something that I cannot wrap my
> > head around, because that basic question was not answered yet.
> 
> What specific question?

The one I asked at the very beginning of this discussion:

  https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=59900#8

> pcase is extensible: It allows to define new pattern types.  "rx.el"
> defines a `rx' pcase pattern, "map.el" a `map' pcase pattern.  The
> normal way to be able to use them is to `require' the library in which
> they are defined.
> 
> Since `pcase' is a macro, the library (rx.el or map.el) must be loaded
> when a `pcase' form using such a pattern is compiled.
> 
> The `rx' pattern definition in rx.el uses autoload cookies so that
> compiling works even when rx.el is not loaded - it gets loaded
> automatically when compiling.
> 
> The map.el `map' pcase pattern doesn't use autoloading.  The OP found a
> case where compiling succeeded until some days ago without requiring
> map.el explictily, and now a require is needed.  But that was only by
> luck: AFAIU, map.el was already loaded in that scenario, and now it is
> any more.  But there is no guarantee that the library is always loaded
> when compiling arbitrary files, so one should _always_ explicitly
> require map.el when the file contains pcase forms with `map' patterns -
> even if this worked without in some cases in the past by luck.
> 
> The wish of the OP to make the `map' pattern in map.el `autoload'able
> like the `rx' pattern in rx.el is reasonable, I can try to create a
> patch.
> 
> But strictly speaking here is no bug, just the OP relying on something
> that in the past worked by luck.

It sounds like the bug is in the package which uses map.el, and that
package is not part of Emacs.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]