bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#40351: Flymake error count


From: Stefan Kangas
Subject: bug#40351: Flymake error count
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 00:50:42 -0800

João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:

> Hello, sir@hacktivista.com:
>
> I'm sorry for the very long delay in answering this.  Next time you
> report a bug for flymake, make sure you also forward me the message that
> the bug reporting system sends back to you.  (yes I know you had written
> me separately).
>
> Anyway, to your problem:
>
>
>>                        for (beg . end) = (flymake-diag-region source lnum)
>>                        for type = (make-symbol (match-string 3))
>                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> I think the problem you experience is found here.  TYPE cannot be a
> different symbol for each error you find, otherwise Flymake will think
> that each error has its unique type.  If `(match-string 3)` is indeed
> often enough the same string, you can try `intern` instead.
>
> Let's say (match-string 3) can only return "oops", "warn" or "info" I would 
> write
> that line like
>
>     for type = (intern (format "flymake-phpcs--%s" (match-string 3)))
>
> Then separately I would write in a top-level-form
>
>     (put 'flymake-phpcs--oops 'flymake-category 'flymake-error)
>     (put 'flymake-phpcs--warn 'flymake-category 'flymake-warning)
>     (put 'flymake-phpcs--info 'flymake-category 'flymake-note)
>
> Then the errors would be merged with the errors from Eglot, I think.
>
> See the manual section 2.1 Customizing Flymake error types
>
> I see the the docstring for `flymake-make-diagnostic` could see some
> improvement.  In particular, the phrase "TYPE is a key to symbol"
> doesnt' make much sense.

There have been no further replies here within 2.5 years, so I'm going
to assume the above was enough to resolve this issue.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.

If this conclusion is incorrect and this is still an issue, please reply
to this email (use "Reply to all" in your email client) and we can
reopen the bug report.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]