bug#59692: 29.0.60; Reduce installation size by disabling byte-compilation for some lisp files that won't benefit

[Stefan Kangas]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> FWIW, I consider this to be a waste of our resources and a long-term
> maintenance burden that I cannot justify, even if I accept your conclusions
> (and I'm not at all convinced that they are completely correct, especially
> since you didn't show any measurements of code speed with and without
> byte-compilation).  50 MiB of disk space is too small to justify keeping
> track of all the files, making decisions which will and will not be
> compiled, etc.  Disk space is cheap these days.
>
> So I don't think we should do this.

I agree, so I'm closing this as wontfix.