|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | bug#60333: [PATCH] whitespace: Update bob, eob markers in base and indirect buffers |
Date: | Wed, 28 Dec 2022 09:44:22 -0500 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
>> "Expose" is the wrong term, because we don't have that info ready to >> be exposed. We'd either have to create&maintain that list, or compute >> it on-demand when requested. [...] > 1. Maintain internal indirect buffer list associated with buffers in C That's the "create&maintain that list" option. Personally I don't like it: I'd like to reduce the amount of support we provide in C for indirect buffers rather than increase it. Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |