bug#60525: 29.0.60; tree-sitter support in semantic-symref

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 03:51:28 +0200
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
> 
> On 03/01/2023 20:06, Juri Linkov wrote:
> > +    (c-ts-mode "*.[ch]")
> >       (c++-mode "*.[chCH]" "*.[ch]pp" "*.cc" "*.hh")
> > +    (c++-ts-mode "*.[chCH]" "*.[ch]pp" "*.cc" "*.hh")
> >       (html-mode "*.html" "*.shtml" "*.php")
> >       (mhtml-mode "*.html" "*.shtml" "*.php") ; FIXME: remove
> >                                               ; duplication of
> > @@ -53,7 +55,10 @@ semantic-symref-filepattern-alist
> >                                               ; major mode definition?
> >       (ruby-mode "*.r[bu]" "*.rake" "*.gemspec" "*.erb" "*.haml"
> >                  "Rakefile" "Thorfile" "Capfile" "Guardfile" "Vagrantfile")
> > +    (ruby-ts-mode "*.r[bu]" "*.rake" "*.gemspec" "*.erb" "*.haml"
> > +                  "Rakefile" "Thorfile" "Capfile" "Guardfile" 
> > "Vagrantfile")
> >       (python-mode "*.py" "*.pyi" "*.pyw")
> 
> Instead of duplicating entries, we could try to look up the remappings 
> in major-mode-remap-alist.

That doesn't sound to me like the use of major-mode-remap-alist that
was intended.

I'm okay with duplication at this point.  It is much easier, and we
can always augment or fix later as needed.  I see no reason to do
anything fancier at this point.

Stefan, Lars, WDYT?