[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#63731: [PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appr
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
bug#63731: [PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appropriate |
Date: |
Fri, 26 May 2023 17:29:41 +0200 |
>>>>> On Fri, 26 May 2023 08:06:11 -0700, Steven Allen <steven@stebalien.com>
>>>>> said:
Steven> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> AFAIU, this change will populate composition-function-table for many
>> "normal" characters, including ASCII digits and symbol/punctuation
>> characters from the 0x2xxx blocks. E.g., after you build Emacs with
>> this patch, what do the following evaluations yield:
>>
>> M-: (aref composition-function-table ?0) RET
>> M-: (aref composition-function-table #x2122) RET
>>
>> If they yield non-nil values, it could mean dramatic slowdown of
>> redisplay with these characters.
Steven> Both of these yield nil with this patch applied (and I haven't
noticed
Steven> any performance regressions). But it looks like you and Robert have
a
Steven> better patch so I'll leave you to it.
Itʼs smaller, thatʼs for sure. And it will definitely be faster.
Steven> However, I'd like to draw your attention to the existing hard-coded
Steven> VS-16 table here:
Steven>
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/tree/admin/unidata/emoji-zwj.awk?h=4b3de748b0b04407d2492500c77905de56de1180#n72
Steven> It feels like this should either be the full table (the one in the
Steven> patch) or it shouldn't exist at all. But again, I'm not the expert
here.
Welcome to the wonderful world of Unicode. The reason the table exists
is that there are codepoints that are *not* emoji, but theyʼre part of
emoji sequences, so we still need to treat them as emoji in some
situations. Why Unicode didnʼt just make them emoji I donʼt know.
Robert
--
- bug#63731: [PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appropriate, (continued)
- bug#63731: [PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appropriate, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/05/26
- bug#63731: [PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appropriate, Robert Pluim, 2023/05/26
- bug#63731: [PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appropriate, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/05/26
- bug#63731: [PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appropriate, Robert Pluim, 2023/05/26
- bug#63731: [PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appropriate, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/05/26
- bug#63731: [PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appropriate, Robert Pluim, 2023/05/26
- bug#63731: [PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appropriate, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/05/26
- bug#63731: [PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appropriate, Robert Pluim, 2023/05/26
- bug#63731: [PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appropriate, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/05/26
bug#63731: [PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appropriate, Steven Allen, 2023/05/26