[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnulib] full-write.c / full-read.c consolidation
From: |
Jeff Bailey |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnulib] full-write.c / full-read.c consolidation |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Jan 2003 09:51:43 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 01:59:22PM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
> > BTW, we should avoid ranges (and abbreviations) in copyright lines.
> The one who says "we should" is Mr. Bushnell, and his arguments are
> not convincing.
I'm forwarding the question to the FSF legal group. I think if the
copyright holder's lawyers want us to do it, then fine.
Certainly it ought to be clearly specified one way or the other with an
appropriate justification in the GCS.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
- [Bug-gnulib] full-write.c / full-read.c consolidation, Jim Meyering, 2003/01/07
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] full-write.c / full-read.c consolidation, Karl Berry, 2003/01/07
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] full-write.c / full-read.c consolidation, Karl Berry, 2003/01/08
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] full-write.c / full-read.c consolidation, Karl Berry, 2003/01/08
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] full-write.c / full-read.c consolidation, Karl Berry, 2003/01/08
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] full-write.c / full-read.c consolidation, Karl Berry, 2003/01/08