[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnulib] feature request: argp()
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnulib] feature request: argp() |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Jun 2003 21:08:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > I don't think -I- is portable. That's why we copy
> > alloca_.h to alloca.h
> > sysexit_.h to sysexits.h
> > if the system doesn't have this include file.
>
> Right, but will writing
>
> #include <sysexits.h>
>
> in your application code and having the sysexits.h file residing in
> the application source tree work if the user uses -I-? I'm not sure
> how gnulib modules are (will be) integrated into applications, so
> maybe that process takes care of this problem, either by disallowing
> -I- or make sure the -I. is added again after any -I-.
Why would anyone use -I- when attempting to use portable programs?
(-I- is specific to gcc.)
Also the various -I options that automake adds by itself are undocumented;
anyone using -I- from within a Makefile.am is likely to fall on his face
by disabling some automake functionality (like VPATH builds).
Bruno
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] sysexits.h, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] sysexits.h, Paul Eggert, 2003/06/11
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] sysexits.h, Bruno Haible, 2003/06/11
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] sysexits.h, Simon Josefsson, 2003/06/11
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] sysexits.h, Paul Eggert, 2003/06/11
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] sysexits.h, Bruno Haible, 2003/06/12
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] feature request: argp(), Jim Meyering, 2003/06/10
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] feature request: argp(), Bruno Haible, 2003/06/10
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] feature request: argp(), Simon Josefsson, 2003/06/10
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] feature request: argp(), Bruno Haible, 2003/06/10
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] feature request: argp(), Simon Josefsson, 2003/06/11
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] feature request: argp(),
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] feature request: argp(), Simon Josefsson, 2003/06/11
Re: [Bug-gnulib] feature request: argp(), Karl Berry, 2003/06/08